Respuesta :
To Jacksonians the Adams- Clay alliance represented a Corrupt Bargain system where elite interposers pursued their own interests without heeding the will of the people.
Discuss the "Corrupt Bargain" and what kind of political impact it had in the 1828 election (Jackson defeats Adams)?
All four of the campaigners were Popular- Republicans, so there had been no party primary to constrict the field. When the votes were counted, Jackson had entered,901 votes. Adams won,023, while Clay and Crawford tagged the ticket with,217 and,979 independently. Jackson had won roughly 41 percent of the vote; Adams entered about 30 percent; Clay garnered 13 percent of the vote; Crawford entered about 11 percent.
When the electoral council suggested, Jackson again led with 99 electoral votes. Adams amassed 84 electoral votes, while Clay entered 41. Crawford entered 37 electoral votes. While Jackson led in both the popular vote and the electoral council, he didn't admit the 131 electoral vote maturity demanded to win. In such a case, the 12th Correction to the United States provides a remedy the House of Representatives selects a winner from among the top three campaigners.
Only Adams and Jackson actually came up for consideration in the House of Representatives, but the third- place presidential seeker Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives at the time. complexion had converted the representatives who would have cast their vote for him to throw their support behind Adams.
As a result, John Quincy Adams entered one vote further than Jackson. Adams was named chairman because of the loose bargain he made with Henry Clay.
To learn more about Corrupt Bargain refers to:
https://brainly.com/question/22422520
#SPJ10