Based on the fact that Bill reduced Megan's salary because she refused his sexual advances, this is a quid pro quo case.
This is a case where parties are meant to exchange goods or services in a way that both get what they want.
Megan wanted a raise and Bill wanted a sexual favor. When Megan refused the sexual favor, Bill refused the raise. This is therefore a quid pro quo case.
Find out more on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission at https://brainly.com/question/14774625.
#SPJ12