Question

Which statements accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003?

Choose all answers that are correct.


The Iraqi army and air force were too strong for the U.S. military to defeat.


Invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying al-Qaeda.


UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.


Saddam Hussein was a moderate leader and an important ally of Israel.

Answer 1

Answer:

B) Invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda.

C) UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

PLEASE CHOOSE ME AS BRAINLIEST :)

Answer 2

Answer: The answers to your question would be B and C. The statements that accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 were that invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda, and that the UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

Please give brainliest if this helped! :) Have a good day!