Question

explain why a historian might not think that this resolution from the Samara peasant assembly was necessarily supported by all peasants across Russia.

Answer 1

This resolution was from one regional peasant assembly and did not necessarily reflect the opinion of the entire country. There might have been other groups of peasants in different areas of the country who disagreed with the resolution proposed by the one in Samara.

Answer 2

A historian might not think that the resolution of the Samaran peasants assembly would not be admissible by all the peasants group as it would not take into account, the opinions of the other groups as well.

There should be clarity and an overall uniformity in the decisions that are accepted by a group and should not be restricted to an individual group of an entire region.

Samaran Peasants

• To achieve the unbiased-ness that can be found in the decisions taken by the single group of Samaran peasants, the historians are said not to take into account the discrepancies of such decisions.

• A resolution is passed only when a significant amount of votes are received in favor of such proposition and hence this would not lead to a collective decisions.

• The resolution taken by Samaran Resolution would not be admissible to the entire part of Russia to obtain the acceptance of entire groups of Russia in majority.

Hence, a historian should not taken into account the resolution from Samaran peasants assembly to be applicable to entire Russia due to biased-ness in the resolution.

To know more about Samaran peasants, click the link below,

https://brainly.com/question/530966