Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.
Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.
This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.
Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.
Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360
#SPJ1