What mistake did Lindsay make?

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Discussion and Correction
The algrebra itself is fine. The exclusions are not so good. The difficulty comes in the denominator. It factors into (2x)(x - 3). x cannot take on a value of 0 (that was pointed out and that is correct). The problem comes in the plus/minus 3. Plus 3 is correct. x - 3 will come 0 if x = 3. Nothing bad will happen if x = - 3
Answer: So the exclusions in the denominator should be modified to x = 3.
Answer:
The excluded values are x-values that make the denominator of the original expression zero, since [tex]\dfrac{a}{0}[/tex] is undefined.
[tex]x = -3[/tex] is not an excluded value since this x-value does not make the denominator zero.
[tex]x = -3[/tex] makes the numerator zero, but as [tex]\dfrac{0}{a}=0[/tex] it is not an excluded value.
Therefore, step 3 of her work should read:
[tex]\textsf{Finding excluded values}:x\neq 0\:\textsf{and}\:x\neq 3[/tex]