Question

1. The argument Brutus makes in scene i is that they must kill Caesar to prevent him from abusing his

power in the future. Is there any

evidence that he might abuse his power? Is this prevention

justified? Are there times when it is justified to attempt to prevent misconduct or crime when the

supposed perpetrator hasn't yet done anything wrong? Explain.

Answer 1

There were evidences that Caesar would get to a point where he would abuse his powers as the ruler. This is because Caesar had been seen to commit some actions in the past.

Why Brutus killed Caesar

Although Brutus had perpertrated this act because he felt it was the best thing to do, it was a wrong move from him.

He is a murderer, and there is no justification for taking a life in any case especially in a situation where no wrong has been done.

Read more on Caesar here:  https://brainly.com/question/1324420