I think most judges have a definition of judicial activism, it’s a ruling you don’t like.” activism or restraint. Why?

Respuesta :

The idea of judicial activism is one that is hated by people because most judges ruling are concrete and as such:

 US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a statement that people needs to read judges' written decisions as they will see that their decision is not arbitrarily.

Why should judges use judicial activism or restraint?

Judicial activism is known to be one that aids modern values and conditions and it is known to have a lot of methods used in approaching the Constitution to handle legal matters.

But , legal restraint is known too be one that creates some kinds of limitations to the the power of judges and it is said to reduce their powers of striking down laws and giving this power or work to the legislation.

Learn more about judicial activism from

https://brainly.com/question/509532

ACCESS MORE