Question

Which two statements explain some Americans' objections to the results of the 2000 presidential election?

Al Gore's certification as the winner was reversed by both houses of Congress.
Widespread voter fraud raised questions about the integrity of the vote totals.
George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.
The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.
Several states refused to count mail-in ballots that had been received on time.

Answer 1

The two statements that explain why some Americans objected to the 2000 Presidential election are:

• George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.
• The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.

What happened in the 2000 Presidential Election?

Al Gore had won the popular vote but there were some issues with the electoral votes in Florida.

After going to the Supreme Court, there was a ruling on Florida's recount which countered a ruling of Florida's own Supreme Court thereby making the Supreme Court's ruling appear partisan.

George Bush eventually won the Presidential election when he was awarded Florida's votes.

Find out more on the 2000 Election at https://brainly.com/question/1292018.

Answer 2

Answer:

1.George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.

2.The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.

Explanation:

I got it right on edmentum/plato course.