Question

Which two statements describe the Supreme Court's ruling in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union?


State and federal tax money could be distributed to religious schools.

Provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional.

Speech on the internet must be regulated to protect the nation's children.

Online content-based restrictions violate the guarantee of freedom of speech.

Less restrictive alternatives such as parental controls were potentially an effective option.

Answer 1

Answer:

Provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional.

Online content-based restrictions violate the guarantee of freedom of speech.

Explanation:

got it right

Answer 2

The two statements that  describe the Supreme Court's ruling in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union is that the provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional, and Online content-based restrictions violate the guarantee of freedom of speech.

What is Civil Liberties?

Civil liberties are rights and freedoms that governments promise not to limit without due process, whether through the constitution, legislation, or judicial interpretation.

The Supreme Court's decision in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union can be summarized as, In the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) was unconstitutional, and online content-based limitations infringe the right to free speech.

Therefore, option B and D are correct.

Learn more about the Civil Liberties, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/5992809

#SPJ2