How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about federal government?


Webster believed the federal government was created by the people, while Calhoun believed it was formed by the states.


Webster believed the federal government was created by a compact among states, while Calhoun believed that it was created separate from state government influence.


Webster believed that the federal government had more power than the Constitution, while Calhoun believed that the federal government was only more powerful than state governments.


Webster believed that the federal government was less effective at passing laws than state governments, while Calhoun believed it was more effective at passing laws.

Respuesta :

The difference between Daniel Webster and John Calhoun in their opinion of the federal government was that Webster believed the federal government was created by the people, while Calhoun believed it was formed by the states.

How did Calhoun and Webster differ?

Calhoun believed that the federal government was created by the states which meant that the states did not have to listen to laws that the federal government passed if they thought it was unconstitutional.

Webster on the other hand, believed the federal government was formed by the people and so the people's needs should be put first.

In conclusion, option A is correct.

Find out more on Webster and Calhoun at https://brainly.com/question/26538123.

Answer:

THE ANSWER IS DOWN BELOW :)

Ver imagen krosskeda
ACCESS MORE