Answer:
0.0930; fail to reject the null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample Statistics
[tex]\bar{x}=153.2[/tex]
[tex]n=40[/tex]
Population Statistics
[tex]\sigma=30.86[/tex]
[tex]\mu=145[/tex]
Claim
The mean weight of women is 145lbs
Counterclaim:
The mean weight of women is not equal to 145lbs
Null hypothesis
[tex]H_0:\mu=145[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis
[tex]H_1:\mu\neq145[/tex]
Significance Level
[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] for a 2-tailed test at a 95% confidence level
Test Statistic
[tex]Z=\frac{\bar{x}-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{153.2-145}{\frac{30.86}{\sqrt{40}}}\approx1.6805[/tex]
Corresponding p-value
[tex]p=2[$normalcdf(1.6805,\infty,0,1)]\approx2(0.04643)\approx0.09286\approx0.0930[/tex]
The test is 2-tailed because our alternate hypothesis, [tex]H_1[/tex], already implies that the population mean, [tex]\mu[/tex], could be either less than or greater than 145lb. Since 0.09286>0.05, we are within the 95% confidence level, so there's insufficient evidence in our sample data to suggest that we reject the null hypothesis. This means that it's 9.3% more likely that the null hypothesis is true than the alternate hypothesis is. Thus, the sample data do not differ significantly from the expected mean of 145lb.