In "Selection 2: No More Interference in Our Personal Lives," the author argues that the seat belt
requirement for workers in the agricultural industry interferes with their ability to complete daily
tasks and does not provide them with meaningful protection
Explain the supporting evidence the author provides in the argument against the requirement of
seat belts for agricultural workers.
B IV 33 X X3
Je the
w of
an
ty miles
unless

Respuesta :

In No More Interference in Our Personal Lives, the author mainly uses an example and logical statements to support the idea seatbelts can interfere with the work of the agricultural industry workers.

What is "No More Interference in Our Personal Lives"?

This is a short text that shows the position of a farmer against the use of seatbelts.

What is the evidence provided by the author?

In this text, the author uses an example or hypothetical situation that shows how requiring to use the seatbelt can interrupt his job and even have negative consequences.

This is mentioned in

  • ...you gun the engine to catch them. Suddenly, in your rearview mirror you see the blue light, requiring to pull over... your livelihood gallops down the road.

Moreover, the author connects statments using logic by showing the relationship between the seatbelt and negative consequences to support the point seatbelts can have negative effects for the workers of this industry.

Learn more about author in: https://brainly.com/question/6560941

Answer:

In No More Interference in Our Personal Lives, the author mainly uses an example and logical statements to support the idea seatbelts can interfere with the work of the argricultrural Industry workers

Explanation:

i took the test

Otras preguntas

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS