Question

Which details from the text best support the analysis that the narrator is in awe of the city at night? Select three options.

“But it was not dark. Everywhere there were lights.”
“I thought to myself ‘This is a strong magic’ and trembled.”
“That was a sight indeed—yes, that was a sight: I could not have seen it in the body—my body would have died.”
“Everywhere went the gods, on foot and in chariots.”
“It was magic what they could do—it was magic what they did."

Answer 1

It should be noted that the inference from the text that supports the analysis include:

A. "But it was not dark. Everywhere there were lights."

B. "I thought to myself 'This is a strong magic' and trembled."

C. "That was a sight indeed -yes, that was a sight: I could not have seen it in the body -my body would have died."

Importance of inference

In the story, the narrator is traveling through the Great Places of Gods.

He sees them everywhere and he is in awe. He is overwhelmed with admiration and fear. The inference above supports that the narrator is in awe of the city at night.

Learn more about inference on:

https://brainly.com/question/25280941

Answer 2

A.) "But it was not dark. Everywhere were the lights."

B.) "I thought to myself 'This is a strong magic' and trembled."

C.) "Everywhere went the gods, on foot and in chariots."