malasha72 malasha72
  • 21-01-2022
  • Business
contestada

Why should relevant costs be reflected in the objective function but not sunk costs?

Respuesta :

dakotalopez37
dakotalopez37 dakotalopez37
  • 21-01-2022

Answer:

Sunk costs (past costs) or committed costs are not relevant. Sunk, or past, costs are monies already spent or money that is already contracted to be spent. A decision on whether or not a new endeavour is started will have no effect on this cash flow, so sunk costs cannot be relevant.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

what is 50+60 i need help
9,835/63 what is the answer and what is the remainder
2/3m^5 - 5/7m^5n^8 I need an explanation of this problem.
Write the equation so that a = 1: x2 + -6 x = -13 Complete the square: x2 – 6x + = –13 +
change -23/20 into a deciamal
plum-pudding model other name​
What is the term for the type of venation seen on a ginkgo tree? Help meeeee
A bag contains the following marbles: 8 black marbles, 12 blue marbles, 18 brown marbles, and 6 green marbles. What is the ratio of brown marbles to blue marble
You are standing at the edge of a cliff which is 40 m tall. You throw an apple up with a speed of 15 m/s, and it accelerates downward at 9.81 m/s^2. How long do
What’s the correct answer answer asap for brainlist