Looking for evidence entails careful study. The answers to the question is below;
The crime that Mr. Fraser describes is drive-by killing.
The police select their suspect by the act of showing pictures to one of the teenagers and thereafter they the suspect out, the suspect the saw that shoot the father.
The fact was that there was no evidence since they did not find the gun and the car used in the crime was not identified. Even the suspect vehicle (shooter) was not identified also.
The approximate figure is about 252 out of 367 cases of wrongful conviction have been identified. That is 69% of DNA exonerations. Others about 250-285 cases.
The National Registry of Exonerations has stated that about 450 non-DNA-based exonerations where there was eyewitness misidentification. That is about 3 quarters have eye witness testimonies.
Reconstructive memory is simply known as the act of remembering that involves the reproduction of an experience or event that is known to be partially stored in memory before.
Fraser challenged the judge to go out and inspect the crime scene themselves.
The outcome of the challenge was that the judge thereby granted the retrial for Francisco Carrillo and thus released him so he can prepare his defense before the prosecution day.
Mr. Fraser suggested that people learn to be more effective with how they handle things or situations so as to get the right evidence and also that people be more cautious about how true some eyewitness testimonies may be.
Learn more about this case from
https://brainly.com/question/24612601
