In Plessy v. Ferguson, Justice Brown uses both logos and ethos in his opinion. In your opinion, does his use of ethos and logos seem to conflict with each other in his argument?

Respuesta :

The use of logos and ethos will only conflict if one of these features questions or denies the effect of the other feature.

What is it and what is the importance of using logos and ethos?

  • Logos is a rhetoric resource that stimulates logic.
  • With the use of logos, an argument shows the logical relationship between two elements and stimulates the listeners' reasoning.
  • The use of ethos, in turn, stimulates ethics.
  • With this rhetoric device, the argument stimulates moral and ethical values ​​and reinforces the authority and experience of the author or speaker.

It is not common for these arguments to be contradictory to each other, as they must be used harmoniously. However, it is possible that this contradiction will occur, if the argument shows an ethical and moral value that undermines the logic, or vice versa.

As you didn't show the argument to which your question refers, it is not possible to determine if ethos and pathos are in conflict, but I hope the above information can help you.

More information about rhetoric resources at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/24323066

RELAXING NOICE
Relax