The point of view in Henry's speech is that England has behaved violently against the colonists. For this reason, he demands that the colons turn against England. Douglass's point is that the meaning of the 4th of July is corrupted by slavery. For this reason, he calls for the abolition of slavery across America.
Based on this, we can answer the other questions as follows:
- To support this view, Henry shows how British troops are building up in America as a threat to settlers.
- Douglas, on the other hand, uses the hypocrisy of the white population to celebrate freedom in a country that does not provide freedom for its people.
- The two speakers use valid reasons to support their views, as these are reasons that can be easily verified and visualized, showing that they are not incorrect.
- Douglass and Henry use their own experiences as evidence to support these reasons. Douglas shows what it means to be a slave in America, while Henry, shows what it is like to be a colonist in constant threat of oppression.
- These pieces of evidence are relevant, as all the public could prove them and even go through the same situations.
- Neither of the two speakers uses fallacious reasoning, as they only provide logical, correct, and verifiable data and evidence. However, they make strong use of pathos to persuade listeners.
- In Henry's speech, the counterclaims could attest to the kindness and friendship between England and the American colonies. He effectively counters these counterclaims by showing that there are no threats between friendly and kind nations.
- About Douglass' speech, the counterclaims can assert that there is freedom in the country, even amid slavery. Douglass responds to these claims efficiently, asserting that if the majority of the American population is not free, it means that there is no freedom in the country.
After this analysis, we can affirm that the arguments of both speakers are efficient.
More information about pathos at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/24193390
