Question

A growing community considers building a new hospital closer to residential neighborhoods. This will get residents to emergency care faster and save lives when it is needed. The only land available near residential areas is a forested wetland that supports a variety of species. What is a political consequence of not using the land for a new hospital?
Emergency care is farther away, risking the health and well-being of a growing community.
Preserving the ecosystem may upset residents in a community with a hospital shortage.
If there are fewer hospitals, it can slow down the number of new medical career opportunities.
It protects the lives of species and prevents a reduction in carbon sequestering by the trees.

Answer 1

A political consequence of not using the land for a new hospital is that preserving the ecosystem may upset residents in a community with a hospital shortage.

A very important consideration when citing infrastructure is the environmental impact of such projects. This is because, infrastructure is built on land at the expense of the ecosystems that survive in such habitat. Building the said hospital is going to have the negative impact of decrease in biodiversity.

A political consequence of not using the land for a new hospital is that preserving the ecosystem may upset residents in a community with a hospital shortage.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/8646601