Question

Which of the following was the question at the heart of the Gideon v. Wainwright case?
A.) Do people accused of crimes have a right to remain silent under questioning?
B.) Must a warrant to search a property list exactly what police expect to find there?
C.) Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one?
D.) If proper arrest procedures are not followed must a judge dismiss a criminal case?

Answer 1

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one? "


Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!

Answer 2

The heart of the case of Gideon v. Wainwright was about the states that the obliged to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one.

Option C is correct.

What is the case of Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright is a United States Supreme Court, history's landmark case.

In this case, the Supreme Court unanimously judged that states are needed under the 6th amendment in the constitution of the US.

In the given landmark, case, Gideon desired comfort from his trust by pointing a requisition for judicial writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court.

This case is about the problem that the state is under an obligation to provide counsel at the time the defendant cannot afford it.

At last, the decision was declared as being consentient in favor of Gideon.

Therefore, option C is correct.

To learn more about the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/565482