The architects of constitutions need to consider trade-offs as they empower the government to solve problems that require collective action.
- Undertaking collective action projects is not efficient when left in the hands of individuals. People tend to be individualistic in their aspirations and actions.
- Given this situation, however, meeting people's collective needs should not be detrimental to their welfare. And at the same, the latency to execute projects that will benefit all should be reduced by empowering governments to effect beneficial changes.
- Governments, on the other hand, always like to take on enormous responsibilities than they can handle. The architects must guard against the government becoming too big and powerful by controlling more resources than the citizens.
- Such a powerful government undermines the rights of individuals and uses its excesses to constrain individuals.
Thus, constitution framers should recognize the rights of individuals to manage their private lives against the excesses of the government.
Read more: https://brainly.com/question/17231840
