Question

PLZ HELP FAST
A scientist performed an experiment on mice. Her results are posted below.

After analyzing her results she stated that a mouse must be exposed to more than 500 days of cigarette smoke before the mouse can get lung cancer.
Do you agree with the scientist conclusions?

A.) yes; there is no evidence to support the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke for more than 500 days.

B.) No; there is no evidence to support the idea that cigarette smoke exposure will lead to lung cancer in mice.

C.) No; some mice may have developed lung cancer in less than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

D.) Yes; the majority of the lung cancer cases were the result of more than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

Answer 1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because there is a 500 day gap in the evidence, some mice may have gotten cancer on the first day, or the 499th day.

Answer 2

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think it's A since her grounds or conclusions are not accurate because there is no evidence to abet the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke.

B is not accurate since an experiment was performed.