The missing reasons in the proof using the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem diagram that is given are:
a. Corresponding angles
b. Vertical Angles, and
c. Alternate interior angles
- Two angles lying opposite each other along a transversal, and are within the two lines crossed by the transversal are referred to as alternate interior angles.
- According to the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem, the two alternate interior angles are congruent to each other.
- Let's state out our proof using the image given:
Statement 1: line l is parallel to line m
Reason: Given
Statement 2: [tex]\angle 2 \cong \angle 6[/tex]
Reason: Corresponding Angles (both angles occupy the same corner, hence they correspond to each other. Corresponding angles have the same measure).
Statement 3: [tex]\angle 4 \cong \angle 2[/tex]
Reason: Vertical angles (both angles are directly opposite each other as they share the same point, which makes them vertical angles. Vertical angles have equal measure).
Statement 4: [tex]\angle 6\cong \angle 4[/tex]
Reason: Alternate Interior Angles (applying the transitive property which says if a = b, and b = c, then a = c, therefore, since [tex]\angle 2 \cong \angle 6, $ and $ \angle 4 \cong \angle 2, $ then $ \angle 6 \cong \angle 4[/tex])
In conclusion, the missing reasons in the proof using the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem diagram that is given are:
a. Corresponding angles
b. Vertical Angles, and
c. Alternate interior angles
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/18898800