"Profiting on the Backs of Child Laborers" By Victoria Riskin and Mike Farrell, Co-chairs of the California Committee (South) of Human Rights Watch

Please write a response in full and complete sentences and explain how Riskin and Farrell built an argument to persuade their audience that child labor in the U.S. agricultural sector is a disgrace and needs to be changed.

In your response, please analyze how Riskin and Farrell use ethos (credibility), logos (facts/data), and pathos (emotion) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of their argument using evidence from the text. Your response should NOT explain whether you agree with Riskin and Farrell’s claims but rather explain how the authors build an argument to persuade their audience. Conclude your essay by restating the main ideas in your analysis, including your evaluation of the authors’ use of rhetorical elements.

To build their argument, the authors of the passage started by providing an example of a child labor case and the amount of suffering that was suffered by children. Three rhetorical appeals were used to buttress the point.

The authors of this article that was published in 2000, used the ethos, logos, and pathos logical appeals to persuade the readers of the fact that the U.S government was being hypocritical in its approach to child labor.

Ethos was used when the authors cited individuals who were credible authorities that had some experience on the subject.

The Human Rights Watch who conducted a study where child farm workers were interviewed are credible sources whose data can be relied on.

Logos was also used extensively in the article. Several facts and statistics were used to back the points made.

Child farm workers' ages were said to be as low as 13 and they spent up to 14 hours on the farms. 300,000 - 800,000 child laborers were said to be working on U.S farms when the article was written.

Fatalities among child laborers in agriculture were said to be five times higher than those in other sectors. An estimate of 100,000 children was said to have suffered injuries related to agriculture.

These figures are concrete data that can persuade readers of the author's grasp of the subject matter.

Pathos which is an appeal to emotion was used to arouse the reader's sense of pity. For example, at the outset of the story, Damaris was said to have suffered nosebleeds and other illnesses related to her exposure to pesticides.

Cancer and brain damage were mentioned as sicknesses that the children were prone to.

The children dropped out because they were too exhausted to study. They were said to be given no masks and paid low wages. The act was described as "shameful tolerance" of child labor by the government.

All of these points are appeals to the emotions of the readers who will feel appalled at this amount of suffering.

Summarily, the aim of the writers was to expose the unfair child labor that was prevalent in the U.S. They praised the efforts of people like Senator Tom Hakin who were trying to make child labor laws that will protect the children in agriculture.

The authors were also successful in their use of rhetorical appeals as the main points were made.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/8353123