In what ways is this account of creation according to modern science similar to the mythic and religious account in Genesis? In what ways is it different? Do you find it more or less persuasive as an explanation? Why? Do you find it more or less satisfying as an explanation? Why?
scientific and satisfying account of the origins of things. . . . The creation account is clear, definite, sequential, and matter-of-fact, giving every appearance of straightforward historical narrative"
