Question

In sum, we hold that the District's ban on handgun
possession in the home violates the Second Amendment,
as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm
in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-
defense. Assuming that Heller is not disqualified from the
exercise of Second Amendment rights, the District must
permit him to register his handgun and must issue him a
license to carry it in the home.3
What does the author of this excerpt most likely believe?
A. Firearms are highly dangerous and must be strictly regulated by
state and federal governments.
B. A citizen's right to bear arms overrides a city's interest in
protecting public safety.
C. Individual states may prohibit firearm ownership, but the federal
government cannot
D. Any law placing limits on handgun ownership violates the Second
Amendment.

Answer 1

Answer:

The correct answer is - D. Any law placing limits on handgun ownership violates the Second  Amendment.

Explanation:

From reading the excerpt it is quite clear that the author believes that prohibiting or limiting the bearing or owning a gun or other firearm is against the second amendment of the constitution that allows citizens to own a firearm for their self-defense and security.

Any law that limits the owning a handgun or any firearm at home for self-defence and security violates the second amendment, that should not be infringed.