Sen divides 18th Century Enlightenment figures into those who think of justice in terms of contracts, however idealized, and those who think of justice in terms of comparisons between possible alternatives---into which camp does Sen place himself?
A] Sen places himself in the camp of the contract theorists who see justice as the result of an impartial negotiation among the interested parties.
B] Sen places himself in neither camp preferring to think about justice in terms of the capabilities that people can actually attain in the lives they have.
C] Sen places himself in the camp of the comparative thinkers who see justice as a choice between possible alternatives that leave people better or worse off.

Sen splits statistics in 18th century light and those who care about justice as contractual, even so idealized, and that those who think with justice even though regards this same contrast of alternative options to camps may Sen sit in a comparative philosopher's camp, who recognizes justice to become a choice between options of alternative solutions that stronger or worse consider leaving the people.