One of the judges stated that the reason behind the fact that the aggregate limit is bad is sue to the fact that there is no substantial mismatch found between Congress' goal of combating corruption and the ways to set it up.
The district court was said to have held that the aggregate limit served government interests by hindering corruption or the appearance of any form of corruption and thus they set at a good limit.
Note that in 2002, Congress was said to have passed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), that set up two sets of limits to campaign contributions.
The base limit and aggregate limit is known to be recalibrated to factor seen in inflation.
Learn more about Court from
https://brainly.com/question/1302046
