Personally, I favor geographic geography in its tangible form and everything that it entails. My interests are mostly in the areas of climate science, forest dynamics, and natural hazards, all of which are covered in Phy geography. Physical geography studies the non-human features of the planet, such as its geology, topography, hydrology, glaciology, oceanography, volcanology, and so on. Human geography examines how people interact with the environment and where they are located in the world. It can also look at how people interact with other living things. Economic geography, migratory geographies, political ecology, reproductive geography, and cultural geography are just a few of the many subfields under this broad umbrella. The difference between the human and nonhuman might theoretically be contested by arguing that we are all more intricately intertwined and formative of one another than this decision assumes. The concept that human and physical geography might well be studied independently from one another lacks credibility if you reject the positivist assumption that there is a world "out there to be discovered" and that exists coherently and independently of observation.
