Respuesta :
Answer:
C. sentence 4
D. sentence 5
E. sentence 6
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning. Sentences 4, 5, and 6 are all assumptions that lack evidence and clarification.
Sentence 4 assumes that hockey fights set a poor example for fans, without presenting any evidence. We don't know that hockey fights are really setting a poor example for fans or not.
Sentence 5 is similar. The type of logical fallacy in sentence 5 is called slippery slope, which is when one event is assumed to trigger the next one, despite the lack of evidence. Sentence 5 assumes that children watching hockey fights will think it's acceptable to act that way in school. There is no evidence backing this up.
Sentence 6 is also similar. It assumes that hockey players know children look up to them, then assumes that hockey players don't worry about messages their careless fights are assumed to be teaching children. Again, this lacks evidence. No evidence proves that the hockey players think this way. No evidence proves that their fights are wrongly teaching children.
Here's a photo of the review just incase.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d82e/8d82e5d2409a7c06c3d27edadfbae3ce1b32eeba" alt="Ver imagen PlzClickThanks"
The sentences that should be removed to eliminate logical fallacies are sentence 3, sentence 5, and sentence 6.
What is fighting in hockey?
The rules and consequences of participating in a fight are highly technical and can result in serious, fines, penalties and suspensions.
Despite that, fighting in hockey is allowed.
A fight in hockey occurs if players get in a dispute during a hockey game.
They are allowed to drop their gloves and fight.
Thus, the correct options are B, sentence 3, D, sentence 4, E, sentence 6.
Learn more about fighting in hockey
https://brainly.com/question/12996219
#SPJ2