The writer wants to add a conclusion at the end of the passage that summarizes the main argument Which of the following best achieves that goal ? (no links pls)
A. Movie studios may one day tailor films to audience tastes by making them shorter and faster paced and including interactive features to keep audiences engaged
B. Serious viewers , therefore , should choose subtitles to become fully engrossed in the story and the actors ' performances , while casual viewers , who often divide their attention between their television screens and their smartphone screens , should content themselves with dubbing
C. In the future , audiences may be just as excited to view all the Academy Award nominees for Best Foreign Language Film as they are to see the nominees for Best Picture
D. However , Japanese animator Hayao Miyazaki argues that subtitles are no more authentic a translation than dubbing : When you watch the subtitled version you are probably missing just as many things There is a layer and a nuance you're not going to get .
E. Even though people generally watch movies for entertainment researchers cite intriguing studies that show a correlation between watching subtitled films in a different language having a greater proficiency in that languages

The ending of the conclusion is about the argument to the unified end and thus the writer chooses this end. The statement is logical and should be taken as engrossing story and actors and performers have divided attention. The writer is logically making divisions between the smart screens and televisions and could be dubbed the contents.

Find out more information about the passage.

brainly.com/question/22555917.