A homeless man is accused of robbing a convenience store.
Which of the following should happen, and which cases(s) established this process?
A-The man should be informed of his right to an attorney (in re Gault) and to confront his accuser in court (Miranda v. Arizona).
B-The man should be informed of his rights (Miranda v. Arizona) and told his accuser's name (in re Gault).
C-The man should be informed of his rights (Miranda v. Arizona) and provided an attorney (Gideon v. Wainwright).
D-The man should receive official notice of charges (in re Gault) and be questioned with an attorney present (Miranda v. Arizona).
35 points!
