Respuesta :
Answer:
A world without the support of women would be very different from that in which we live in. It would be a world in which everyone must be self sustaining, it would be an angrier world, and it would be a world without feeling, emotion, and passion.
Explanation:
The answer depends on what you want in life, and what you value the most.
Saudi Arabia is a perfect example what a male-only society is like for those curious to know. Women are not to be seen, except to be hidden behind a wall, or a veil. They have no rights and no power of decision. They can be killed over the most trivial reasons without any charges facing the man. It is perhaps no coincidence that the Saudi female demographics takes a sudden dip when they are at the peak of their youth, beauty and honor-killing age.
Women in Saudi Arabia are not allowed to contribute to religion, laws, politics. They (most of them) are not allowed to drive, bicycle, purchase or manage vegetables that have a penile appearances (ex bananas, cucumbers, eggplant), or be seen exposing any skin, be seen outside their home without a male guardian. No matter how young the male is he is in charge of and superior to the Saudi woman, even if the male is three years old, and she must obey him. The women are non-entities, only a permittable presence to give birth to children and to cook. Nothing else. They don’t even have the authority to make decisions in their own home, within their own four walls to which their are prisoners. They only exist, nothing else. With this idealistic male society you basically end up with is a very cold, emotionally stagnant and vicious society - a world shaped by men and a world constantly promoting and enabling hundreds of years of wars and bloodshed. Even nature around it seems to struggle with depression and flowers don’t bloom and everything is dusty, hot, dry and sandy.
If you prefer that - then yes, I guess your life and world would be much better off without women.
In contrary to that image you will find that the most successful and progressive nations in the world, and even through history, are the ones where women have had a greater presence. Their lives exist in tandem with men, not as an inferior or a superior - but just as important part of sharing life. And the more free the women are over their life and decisions, the more peaceful the countries tend to be in general. Take Scandinavia, for example, where women enjoy the highest degree of equal rights to men in the world. These societies, cultures and politics of social justice and equality for all was built on a huge influence from women and how women view the world around them. Women have a natural sense of tenderness for nature, for animals and for ‘the round peg in the square hole’. They feel empathy towards the marginalised. So they are the unseen force behind the laws of equal rights for all, protection of nature and animals, the right for people who are different, for gays, for minorities. In other words it’s women’s demands and views that are behind the laws that creates a democratic society. A peaceful and liberal society is the result.
If you prefer a Scandinavian society versus a Saudi one, then no, your life would not be better without women but you would stagnate and suffer greatly.
Saudi Arabia is a perfect example what a male-only society is like for those curious to know. Women are not to be seen, except to be hidden behind a wall, or a veil. They have no rights and no power of decision. They can be killed over the most trivial reasons without any charges facing the man. It is perhaps no coincidence that the Saudi female demographics takes a sudden dip when they are at the peak of their youth, beauty and honor-killing age.
Women in Saudi Arabia are not allowed to contribute to religion, laws, politics. They (most of them) are not allowed to drive, bicycle, purchase or manage vegetables that have a penile appearances (ex bananas, cucumbers, eggplant), or be seen exposing any skin, be seen outside their home without a male guardian. No matter how young the male is he is in charge of and superior to the Saudi woman, even if the male is three years old, and she must obey him. The women are non-entities, only a permittable presence to give birth to children and to cook. Nothing else. They don’t even have the authority to make decisions in their own home, within their own four walls to which their are prisoners. They only exist, nothing else. With this idealistic male society you basically end up with is a very cold, emotionally stagnant and vicious society - a world shaped by men and a world constantly promoting and enabling hundreds of years of wars and bloodshed. Even nature around it seems to struggle with depression and flowers don’t bloom and everything is dusty, hot, dry and sandy.
If you prefer that - then yes, I guess your life and world would be much better off without women.
In contrary to that image you will find that the most successful and progressive nations in the world, and even through history, are the ones where women have had a greater presence. Their lives exist in tandem with men, not as an inferior or a superior - but just as important part of sharing life. And the more free the women are over their life and decisions, the more peaceful the countries tend to be in general. Take Scandinavia, for example, where women enjoy the highest degree of equal rights to men in the world. These societies, cultures and politics of social justice and equality for all was built on a huge influence from women and how women view the world around them. Women have a natural sense of tenderness for nature, for animals and for ‘the round peg in the square hole’. They feel empathy towards the marginalised. So they are the unseen force behind the laws of equal rights for all, protection of nature and animals, the right for people who are different, for gays, for minorities. In other words it’s women’s demands and views that are behind the laws that creates a democratic society. A peaceful and liberal society is the result.
If you prefer a Scandinavian society versus a Saudi one, then no, your life would not be better without women but you would stagnate and suffer greatly.