Respuesta :

Answer:

argued on grounds of gender discrimination at workplace.

Explanation:

The case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. was initiated by Lilly Ledbetter in 2006 against Goodyear Tire, the company which she had worked for about nineteen years. The case was argued on grounds of gender discrimination at workplace.

The plaintiff, Lily Ledbetter, claimed that she was never accolated for her contributions though she performed equally well like any other employees. Instead, she argued that she was consistently given low rankings during annual performance reviews which consequently affected her wage and salary package.

chilljain33

Ledbetter v. Goodyear tire and rubber co. is an important case in Supreme Court's history of verdict on corporate background cases. This was the case where public interest was involved and had an sentimental attachments of public.

The verdict by court meant that there shall be no discrimination at the workplace based on sex, race, religion and other such types of discrimination.

  • Supreme Court gave the verdict in the favor of Ledbetter that there should be no discrimination by any organisation at the workplace involving not just sex but all other kinds of discrimination.

  • This case has served as a prejudice for numerous future cases which were involved in discrimination and also was appreciated internationally for excellent verdict and in the correct favor.

  • Mr. Ledbetter was the plaintiff in this case and the tire manufacturing company Goodyear tire and rubber co. acted as the defendant as the workplace was the company itself and ledbetter was the employee.

Hence, the Ledbetter v. Goodyear tire and rubber co. case has been instrumental and influential in verdicts given on sex discrimination at workplaces.

To know more about sexual discrimination, please click the link below.

https://brainly.com/question/24881440

ACCESS MORE