loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

How did Andrew Jackson's election illustrate the growth of democracy in the United States? A. Women's votes were a major reason that Jackson won. B. Jackson rep
How many outer electrons does phosphorus have
How many stressed syllables in the word enemy?
simplify 24/40 in simplest form
The first civilizations in Asia formed along the _____ and ____ River valleys around _____ BC. A. Indus; Yangtze; 6000 B. Indus; Yellow; 3000 C. Indus; Yellow;
Is (3,6) A Solution To y = 3x - 3 and y = 2x + 2 Plus I have to show work. >.< Due by tomorrow please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm havingn trouble in math. What's 3/4 - 2/5 in fraction form?
Why is heartwood darker in color than sapwood? A.Heartwood is closer to the center of the stem; sapwood is away from the center of the stem. B.Heartwood does no
what gas does hydrogen change into as a star becomes hotter
the ratio of blue marbles to red marbles in a bag is 11:9. if there are 99 blue marbles in the bag how many marbles are red?