Question

Imagine you are researching the effects of the Black Death in Europe. You have two sources available to you.

Source A: a student-produced website about the plague

Source B: a book written by a historian who is an expert on medieval Europe

Which source do you trust more? Why?
pls answer quick

Answer 1

Answer:

its B

A book written by a historian would be more trustworthy because it is researched and written by someone who is an expert.

Answer 2

Answer:

$\boxed{\boxed{\sf Source \ B }}$

Explanation:

Let's analyze each source.

Source A: student produced website

• A website made by a student isn't trustworthy. It's hard to know where they got their information, how valid their sources are, and how much they paraphrased or changed information.

Source B: book written by a historian

• This source is much more trustworthy. A historian is almost always reliable with great sources and information.

If you are researching, a book written by a historian (Source B) is much more trustworthy.