In the figure, lines I and mare parallel lines cut by transversal p.
Andrea said that if m 2 2 = 40° then m 3 must also be equal to 40°. Which justifies Andrea's statement?
A
Alternate interior angles are congruent.
B. Alternate exterior angles are congruent.
C. Corresponding angles are congruent,
D. Consecutive interior angles are supplementary

In the figure lines I and mare parallel lines cut by transversal p Andrea said that if m 2 2 40 then m 3 must also be equal to 40 Which justifies Andreas statem class=

Respuesta :

Answer:

The statement which justifies Andrea's statement is "Corresponding angles are congruent" C

Step-by-step explanation:

If two parallel lines intersected by a line, then there are some pair of angles are formed

  • Corresponding angles that are congruent
  • Alternate interior angles that are congruent
  • Alternate exterior angles that are congruent
  • Consecutive interior angles that are supplementary

In the given figure

∵ Lines l and m are parallel

∵ They are cut by transversal p

∠2 and ∠3 are in the corresponding position

→ By using the 1st rule above

∵ Corresponding angles are congruent

∠2 ≅ ∠3

m∠3 = m∠2

∵ m∠2 = 40°

∴ m∠3 = 40°

The statement which justifies Andrea's statement is "Corresponding angles are congruent"

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS