Affirmative action was instituted to deal with discrimination. The intent of affirmative action is to repair past discrimination and current discrimination in education and employment and remains highly controversial.

In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court made an important statement on affirmative action in the cases, Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. Summarize these cases.

What important statement did the Court make on the future of affirmative action?

Question

02-12-2020
Law

contestada

Affirmative action was instituted to deal with discrimination. The intent of affirmative action is to repair past discrimination and current discrimination in education and employment and remains highly controversial.

In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court made an important statement on affirmative action in the cases, Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. Summarize these cases.

What important statement did the Court make on the future of affirmative action?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

It’s in the picture pleaseee I need this today

What did Shankar learn about his new posting as a station master? a) He was going to work in an adventurous place. b) He was the only official operating at the

how many grams are there in 2.30x1024 atoms of sikver

I may be simple, I may be complex; I may have a name, but no gender or sex; I am often a question, or statements as a setup; I tend to have an answer, 'til you

Consider a star that is a sphere with a radius of 6.32 108 m and an average surface temperature of 5350 K. Determine the amount by which the star's thermal radi

what is the purpose of messenger RNA

A _______________ is a diagram that shows the relationship of one variable to another.

of the following pair of variables indicate whether you would expect a positive, negative, or no correlation to exist.Maximum daily temperature and cost to co

Evaluate 5⁶/5²is it not 5⁴?

what was the biggest reason for manifest destiny, Social Political or economic reason, why do you think so? please help! :(

teresabell27 teresabell27 · Answer 1 · 2020-12-06T07:53:11+01:00

Answer:

Affirmative action as a practice was partially upheld by the Supreme Court in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), while the use of racial quotas for college admissions was concurrently ruled unconstitutional by the Court in Gratz v. Bollinger (2003).

Affirmative Action – Advantages

Climbing the socioeconomic ladder. ...

Boosting the education of disadvantaged students. ...

Promoting education and work on a communal level. ...

Reverse discrimination. ...

Lack of meritocracy. ...

Demeaning true achievement. ...

Employment. ...

Education.

The Court's majority ruling, authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, held that the United States Constitution "does not prohibit the law school's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body."

Explanation: