Barley was the first grain to be cultivated by the ancient Egyptians. There is ample evidence that barley was baked into loaves that were fermented to make beer. There is, however, no indication that Egyptians of that period ever ate loaves of barley or that they cooked barley to make any other food. Since the possibility that they consumed barley raw can be safely dismissed, it seems probable that at one period the ancient Egyptians consumed cultivated grain in the form of beer only.In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?A) The first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an assumption that is explicitly made in drawing the conclusion of the argument.B) The first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is evidence that was used to support a position to which the argument is opposed.C) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second introduces a phenomenon that the argument seeks to explain.D) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second states a hypothesis that the argument as a whole seeks to refute.E) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second is a statement that is explicitly rejected in drawing that conclusion.

Question

29-11-2020
History

contestada

Barley was the first grain to be cultivated by the ancient Egyptians. There is ample evidence that barley was baked into loaves that were fermented to make beer. There is, however, no indication that Egyptians of that period ever ate loaves of barley or that they cooked barley to make any other food. Since the possibility that they consumed barley raw can be safely dismissed, it seems probable that at one period the ancient Egyptians consumed cultivated grain in the form of beer only.In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?A) The first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an assumption that is explicitly made in drawing the conclusion of the argument.B) The first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is evidence that was used to support a position to which the argument is opposed.C) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second introduces a phenomenon that the argument seeks to explain.D) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second states a hypothesis that the argument as a whole seeks to refute.E) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second is a statement that is explicitly rejected in drawing that conclusion.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Why might it be important to get a lower interest rate on a mortgage? a. lower monthly payment c. interest rate is not important b. higher monthly payment d

there is a beaker of 3.5% acid solution and a beaker of 6% acid solution in the science lab. Mr. Larson needs 200ml of 4.5% acid solution for an experiment. How

While, as though, and if are used to introduce adverb clauses. true false

NEED HELP!!Will give 10 points.Answer correctly

The Dutch art movement de Stijl emerged in the early twentieth century. Which designer was NOT one of this movement’s leading artists?

what is the 3rd phase of mitosis

Miranda obtains a $296,000 15/5 balloon mortgage with a rate of 6.75%. What will her monthly payments be?

simplify this. 5^5 / 5^8

all of the following programs enable young people to serve their country and the world EXCEPT...a. The Peace Corpb. teach for America c. americorpsd.Ameriguild

Miranda obtains a $296,000 15/5 balloon mortgage with a rate of 6.75%. What will her monthly payments be?

ACCESS MORE

topeadeniran2 topeadeniran2 · Answer 1 · 2020-11-29T15:33:09+01:00

Answer: E. ) The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second is a statement that is explicitly rejected in drawing that conclusion.

Explanation:

Based on the information given in the question, we can deduce that the first highlighted portion provides evidence to support the main conclusion and that the second highlighted portion is a statement that is explicitly rejected in drawing that conclusion.

The main issue that we need to focus on with regards to the question is the highlighted part. We don't really have business with the surrounding words. Therefore, the correct option is E.