The Supreme Court hears a case challenging a university’s affirmative-action admission policy, which benefits students from ethnic minority groups. The Supreme Court rules in support of the affirmative-action policy, indicating that the university must continue meeting admission quotas for students from ethnic minority groups, even though this right is not explicitly stated in the Constitution.

What does this scenario reveal about how life terms and judicial review apply to the Supreme Court’s ability to shape public policy?

It allows the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it to modern times.
It requires the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution in cases regarding education.
It allows the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it without any checks.
It requires the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution in cases regarding civil liberties.

This scenario reveals Supreme Court’s ability to shape public policy because: A. It allows the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it to modern times.

What is the Supreme Court?

A Supreme Court is also called an Ap-ex court and it can be defined as a federal court which represents the highest court with respect to the hierarchy of courts within the judicial branch. Also, in terms of jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has both:

Original jurisdiction

Appellate jurisdiction

Based on the information provided, we can deduce that the Supreme Court is allowed to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it to modern times in relation to life terms and judicial review.

Read more on Supreme Court here: https://brainly.com/question/1991159