Respuesta :
Answer:
a. 8 m b. Yes, I would.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Let a be the width of the uniform pathway. Since the uniform pathway plus the park form a rectangle, of which the dimension of the park are 350 m long and 200 m wide respectively, then the dimensions of the park plus path way would be (350 + a) m long and (250 + a) m wide.
So the total area of the park plus pathway is (350 + a)(250 + a) which equals 74,464 m². So,
(350 + a)(200 + a) = 74,464
expanding the brackets, we have
70000 + 350a + 200a + a² = 74,464
collecting like terms, we have
a² + 550a = 74,464 - 70000
a² + 550a = 4,464
a² + 550a - 4,464 = 0
Using the quadratic formula, we find a,
So,
[tex]a = \frac{-550 +/-\sqrt{550^{2} - 4 X 1 X -4,464} }{2 X 1} \\a = \frac{-550 +/-\sqrt{302,500 + 17856} }{2} \\a = \frac{-550 +/-\sqrt{320,356} }{2} \\a = \frac{-550 +/-566} }{2} \\a = \frac{-550 - 566} }{2}or \frac{-550 + 566} }{2} \\a = \frac{-1116} }{2}or\frac{16} }{2} \\a = -558 or 8[/tex]
Since the width of the uniform pathway cannot be negative, so a = 8 m.
So, the width of the uniform pathway is 8 m.
b. If I were Tina, I would like my children to go biking or jogging in the park because, the park has a wide area = 350 m × 200 m = 70000 m² and its perimeter, P = 2(350 m + 200 m) = 2(550m) = 1100 m allows enough distance for biking and jogging.
The width of the pathway also allows for biking and jogging without the children bumping into each other.