contestada

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide
O the sights and sounds of an event.
O insights into the thoughts and feelings of participants in an event.
O a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.
O an evaluation of opinions of people at an event.

Respuesta :

Answer:

C. A more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

May I have brainliest please? :)

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event. Hence, option C is correct.

What is Secondary sources?

Secondary sources is the analysis or evaluation of the historical event, era, or phenomenon, by using the primary source of data. Secondary source is mostly likely to be critiqued or the review of the primary, as they are continuing the primary data.

Secondary source generally includes books, journal articles, speeches, reviews, research reports, and more. Secondary sources are used by academics to support their primary sources when they are writing about historical figures, events, artifacts, or concepts.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more details about Secondary sources, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/336747

#SPJ6

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS
Universidad de Mexico