Question

How should we evaluate a candidate's performance in a debate?

Answer 1

Answer:

We must evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate through the relevance and construction of his arguments and his oratory capacity.

Explanation:

The debate is a way of finding out about a certain topic, through the ability of two or more individuals to argue and speak.

With this, we can affirm that the best way to evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate is through the construction of arguments and the supporting evidence, assessing whether the candidate presents relevant, true and proven information to build an effective argument. The oratorical capacity of the candidate is also important. This must always be calm, integral, fluent and with a good diction.

Answer 2

When evaluating the performance of a candidate in a debate, look at:

• whether they stayed on topic
• the quality of their response
• whether they were good listeners

Presidential debates are very important because they can increase a candidate's chances of getting elected like they did for Ronald Reagan against Gerald Ford.

When checking to see if a candidate is debating well, look at:

• Digression - did they stay on the topic at hand in order to properly address it or did they branch off into other topics that did not matter?

• Quality - how good was their response to issues? Did they have plausible  and practical solutions as opposed to vague ones?

• Listening ability - some candidates talk so much and are so bent on responding that they don't listen to the other candidate's response to provide a quality rebuttal. This is important so watch out for it.

In conclusion, debates should be taken seriously as they show some semblance of the character and potential of candidates and so should be scrutinized seriously.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/18049476.