1. Two people have an argument. You hear two versions of what happened, one from one of the participants and the other from a friend of the other person. Whose version of events would you more likely believe ? Why?

I would most likely believe the participant because they were there and experienced the fight. So therefore they would have the more trustworthy information because they would know first hand what happened. The friend would be less trustworthy, or a 50/50 chance of a true answer because they could be lying or adding to what actually happened to create drama.

Answer Link

1. Two people have an argument. You hear two versions of what happened, one from one of the participants and the other from a friend of the other person. Whose version of events would you more likely believe ? Why?​

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

1. Two people have an argument. You hear two versions of what happened, one from one of the participants and the other from a friend of the other person. Whose version of events would you more likely believe ? Why?