Respuesta :
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
because his friend who wrote the bio was an eyewitness to his friends life so and a primary source is someone who was there when something happened or someone who has first hand knowledge/experience about something, which, in this case, is Charlemagne's friend.
A biography of Charlemagne written by his friend and attendant Einhard in the early 9th century is the best example that describes a primary source. Therefore, the option A holds true.
What is the significance of a primary source?
A primary source can be referred to or considered as a source of any form of expression like an art in which the material information contained has not been taken from the already available sources of information on such topic. A primary source does not ensure credibility of information.
When someone who is a friend of Charlemagne writes as a biography on him during the 9th century, his biography will count as a primary source, as he himself must have known a lot about Charlemagne.
Therefore, the option A holds true regarding the significance of a primary source.
Learn more about a primary source here:
https://brainly.com/question/24511160
#SPJ2