Answer:
Various Human Rights Activists and some ethnic groups in lowland Nepal have accused the Constitution of being gender discriminatory especially in regards to citizenship provisions.
With the formation of an interim legislature
incorporating mainstream parties and Maoists, Nepal’s
peace process hinges on writing a constitution that
permanently ends the conflict, addresses the widespread
grievances that fueled it and guards against the
eruption of new violence. Most political actors have
accepted the Maoist demand for a constituent
assembly (CA) tasked with framing a new dispensation,
although royalists are worried over the future of the
monarchy, which has in effect been suspended. The
major challenge is to maintain leadership-level consensus
while building a broad-based and inclusive process
that limits room for spoilers and ensures long-term
popular legitimacy.
Explanation:
However, The interim constitution promulgated on 15 January
2007 established a framework for constitutional
change and enshrined the guiding principles agreed in
earlier negotiations.
