Question

The court ruled 6-3 in favor of the banning the school for holding the prayer before
games. Justice Rehnquist of the Supreme Court wrote that..
"But even more disturbing than its holding is the tone of the Court's opinion; it
bristles with hostility to all things religious in public life."
Did Justice Rehnquist side with the school's right to have a prayer before games or against their right to do so-

-having prayer before games?

-against having prayer before games?

Answer 1

Answer:

He sided against having prayers before games

Explanation:

The Court and everyone in it "bristles with hostility to all things religious in public life" meaning he wanted to separate church and state, religion should not be something in public is what he's saying.