Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The right to pursue happiness is one of the rights provided by law and it is in harmony with the right to freedom which implies that if individuals are free they should be able to pursue whatever that brings them happiness. In Edward Lepp's case growing marijuana in his farm brought no harm to him or complaints from others. So he believed that he was doing that which brought him happiness. This reasoning is ethical but the work Lepp did violated federal law.
2. Libertarian's believe that people have the right to exercise control over that which rightly belongs to them. Libertarian's in Lepp's case believe that Lepp had a right to his property in this case his farmland where he planted marijuana. And since no one was harmed by what he did, he was not supposed to be harassed and arrested by the police.
The right to pursue happiness license Lepp's Medicinal Gardens as a result of the happiness from growing and smoking marijuana that Lepp derived.
It should be noted that libertarian argument against imprisoning Lepp is that he is doing his stuff on his own private property and his land.
A libertarian argument against imprisoning Lepp was basically that Lepp should not be disturbed since he can do his wishes on his land.
Learn more about Lepp's Medicinal Gardens at;
https://brainly.com/question/11600913
