Respuesta :
Answer:
No the sample does not show that the average age was different in 2010
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 50
The sample mean is [tex]\= x = 38.5[/tex]
The population mean is [tex]\mu = 37[/tex]
The standard deviation is [tex]\sigma = 16[/tex]
The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 5 \% = 0.05[/tex]
The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : \mu = 37[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu \ne 37[/tex]
The critical value of the level of significance obtained from the normal distribution table is ([tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex] )
Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as
[tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu }{ \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]t = \frac{ 38.5 - 37}{ \frac{16}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]
[tex]t = 0.663[/tex]
Now looking at the value t and [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
This mean that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample shows that the average age was different in 2010