Answer:
It's leaving the ending up to the reader.
Explanation:
When an author doesn't resolve a story they want you to think deeper about what might have happned, they want you to come up with your ending for the character/s, they want to see if you were paying attention to the story and find out what might or might not have happned. Hope that makes sence! Also sorry about the typos I can't spell well.
The most likely reason for the author to not include a resolution is that the author wants to keep the reader or listener engaged. Thus, option (A) is correct.
Resolution refers to the strong decision taken at the time of the difficult situation which shows the strong determination powers and ability to take the firm decisions.
Every author's desire to keep the reader or listener interested in their literary works without getting distracted or bored through the resolutions in the story.
The author never tries to solve the problem in the initial phases of the story, rather he creates the tensions in the mind of the readers to stay with the story.
Therefore, it can be concluded that The author wants to keep the reader or listener engaged. Hence, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about resolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15156241
#SPJ5
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was...
What is the most likely reason why the author does not include a resolution?
A. The author wants to keep the reader or listener engaged.
B. The author wants to create a comparison with a famous Greek tale.
C. The author wants to teach lessons about Arabian cultural practices.
D. The author wants to promote the idea of reason and wisdom over power.
